Western General Hosp May 12

 

OPA

"We noted some areas where NHS Lothian is performing well and observed examples of positive, caring behaviour from staff towards patients. However, we also noted a number of areas for improvement. For example, there is an inconsistent approach to mental health screening across the hospital and not all patients receive a nutritional risk assessment within 24 hours of admission, in line with standards."

Susan Brimelow - Chief Inspector

Western General Hospital

Older people in acute hospitals announced inspection

Inspection dates: 11 - 13 April 2012

We carried out an announced inspection to the Western General Hospital from Wednesday 11 April to Friday 13 April 2012.

Before the inspection, we reviewed NHS Lothian’s self-assessment and obtained information about the Western General Hospital from other sources. This included Scotland’s Patient Experience Programme, and other additional data that specifically relate to the care of older people. Based on our review of this information, we decided to focus the inspection on dementia and cognitive impairment. We also inspected nutritional care and hydration due to concerns noted during the inspection.

On the inspection, we spoke with staff and used additional tools to gather more information. We used a formal observation tool in nine wards. We carried out 12 periods of observation during the inspection. In each instance, two members of our team observed interactions between patients and staff in a set area of the ward for 20 minutes.

Areas of strength

We noted areas where NHS Lothian was performing well in relation to the care provided to older people in acute hospitals. We saw many examples of positive caring behaviour during staff interactions with patients and, overall, patients spoke positively of the care and assistance they received.

NHS Lothian has an elderly care assessment team that screens patients within 24 hours of admission to the acute receiving assessment unit. The team provides expert advice to staff to ensure patients over the age of 65 are placed in the most appropriate care setting as quickly as possible.

Within the medicine for the elderly directorate, we saw good examples of patients and their families being consulted and involved in decisions about a patient’s care. In particular, there was good communication about do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions, and decisions around consent to treatment for adults with incapacity issues. However, we noted that decisions around these issues were not as well communicated and documented across other wards and departments inspected.

Overall, patients told us they were happy with the quality of food and the choices on offer. We saw many examples of good practice with staff assisting patients to eat and drink in an encouraging, positive and unhurried manner. One ward inspected had a ‘meal co-ordinator’ whose role is to supervise mealtimes and ensure that patients have the appropriate assistance to eat and drink when required.

Areas for improvement

We found areas where further improvement is required.

We found an inconsistent approach to cognitive impairment (mental health) screening across the hospital. There are various assessment and screening tools in use and we found a lack of clarity about who is responsible for screening and what should happen with the results of a cognitive screening assessment. We also found limited information in the care plans outlining the individual needs of patients with dementia or other cognitive impairments and what interventions or treatment staff should use to meet these needs.

There is no bed management system in place to track the number of bed or ward moves for patients with dementia.

We observed delays of 10–25 minutes between meals being given out and patients being given assistance to eat and drink. Many patients told us that portion sizes were too large and there was food waste.

Not all patients are having a nutritional risk assessment carried out within 24 hours of admission to assess their nutritional status. We also saw no evidence of individualised care plans in place highlighting patients’ eating and drinking likes and dislikes, dietary requirements and food allergies.

This inspection resulted in four areas of strength, twelve areas for improvement and two areas for continuing improvement.

The improvement action plan for this inspection has now been removed from the HEI website, as the inspection took place more than 16 weeks ago. Please contact NHS Lothian for further information on progress against this action plan.

Share this content

Published Date: 21 May 2012